Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would there be a benefit to adding keywords to the ontology #5

Open
cwacekINV opened this issue Apr 22, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Would there be a benefit to adding keywords to the ontology #5

cwacekINV opened this issue Apr 22, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@cwacekINV
Copy link

I had a conversation with Dan Olsher at DO about generating keywords for elements of the ontology, and noted that we had already explored doing that, with mixed results. A sampling of some of the keywords we were able to generate for datatype properties is included below. We determined that this was not effective enough without massive manual curation to include directly into the ontology.

{
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/acl#hasOrder": [
        "control",
        "within",
        "postion",
        "list",
        "number",
        "access",
        "position",
        "entry",
        "order"
    ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/acl#isRecursive": [
        "recursive",
        "grant",
        "recursion",
        "recursively",
        "object",
        "iterative",
        "acl",
        "objects",
        "listed",
        "child",
        "entries",
        "permissions"
    ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#authStatus": [
        "status",
        "success",
        "etc",
        "could",
        "auth",
        "failure",
        "authentication",
        "inprogress",
        "event"
    ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#loginName": [
        "account",
        "via",
        "name",
        "specific",
        "used",
        "identify",
        "keyboard",
        "input",
        "login",
        "string"
    ]
}
@cwacekINV
Copy link
Author

Here's an example of some keywords we sourced using stack overflow (with scores):

{
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/acl#isRecursive": [ [ "nonrecursive", 0.7295090876893041 ], [ "recursively", 0.6426215854350211 ], [ "recursion", 0.6051441101541714 ], [ "closure", 0.6008478541261637 ], [ "depthfirst", 0.5915859774162056 ], [ "linqlike", 0.5882240895483247 ], [ "nontail", 0.5787895768031768 ], [ "tailrecursive", 0.5715128309970288 ], [ "bfs", 0.5646340785671211 ], [ "memoize", 0.5582108036513455 ] ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#authStatus": [ [ "inprogress", 0.527129777815559 ], [ "thisstatus", 0.5168390846249955 ], [ "tempstatus", 0.5021681552141701 ], [ "progress", 0.49858897355167664 ], [ "ifstatus", 0.4943460705706234 ], [ "fullclasssplit", 0.4933231927694189 ], [ "successfailure", 0.49327649102068655 ], [ "auth", 0.4902656257118948 ], [ "authentification", 0.4853285179216026 ], [ "bbpluginjad", 0.4843660204071121 ] ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#loginName": [ [ "fullyqualified", 0.5323924586138464 ], [ "fullname", 0.516713805478136 ], [ "displayname", 0.504951959441364 ], [ "surname", 0.48377735692393825 ], [ "tblxfirst", 0.4823843065232134 ], [ "names", 0.47685891780938294 ], [ "recordcontact", 0.4755596467421599 ], [ "distinguished", 0.4752969834714968 ], [ "age", 0.4734373151068471 ], [ "readhost", 0.47313880949569287 ] ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#loginPass": [ [ "username", 0.6598800147228843 ], [ "logout", 0.6052991313537446 ], [ "pasword", 0.5994572980488897 ], [ "userpassword", 0.5923182710965996 ], [ "logon", 0.5853781992678814 ], [ "password1", 0.5818161613639692 ], [ "userpass", 0.5814719352358263 ], [ "loginpassword", 0.5662747196640523 ], [ "rootpassword", 0.565575323914818 ], [ "signin", 0.5478209678539595 ] ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/authentication#sessionId": [ [ "sessions", 0.6471611242429031 ], [ "cookie", 0.617171460412521 ], [ "httpsession", 0.5576997877336048 ], [ "requestgetsessiontrue", 0.5495014059819578 ], [ "nonunique", 0.5482390339945872 ], [ "login", 0.5449650291920627 ], [ "aspnetsessionid", 0.5425812786171548 ], [ "sessioninvalidate", 0.5405081014766302 ], [ "sessionname", 0.5398087822352003 ], [ "cookies", 0.5350782750080436 ] ],
    "http://www.invincea.com/ontologies/icas/1.0/controls#ruleID": [ [ "rules", 0.7511101260456363 ], [ "namerewrite", 0.6522362762600327 ], [ "namereverseproxyinboundrule1", 0.6335301672022533 ], [ "thumb", 0.6315910634888391 ], [ "namewordpress", 0.6112576529545717 ], [ "outboundrules", 0.6105088258298639 ], [ "catchall", 0.6103948966936892 ], [ "stopprocessingtrue", 0.6082019036131368 ], [ "urlhttpshttphostrequesturi", 0.6076795829322585 ], [ "urlrejectedbyurlscan", 0.605313779006146 ] ]}

@cwacekINV
Copy link
Author

@danielolsher-digitaloperatives Here are a bunch of keywords for datatype properties that we generated from Stack Overflow (which incidentally introduces a bunch of spelling error and such). https://gist.github.com/cwacekINV/6b858e76b1f97d8d2741

You mentioned that you had come up with a pretty effective algorithm for generating keywords. What was your approach?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant