Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the Gauss Newton method used in LSD-SLAM #350

Open
RuibinMa opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Question about the Gauss Newton method used in LSD-SLAM #350

RuibinMa opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@RuibinMa
Copy link

Thank you for sharing the great work! I want to ask a question of the Gauss-Newton method used in your paper.

You used Gauss-Newton method in the 6D space of \xi. The assumption is that the residual is linearly varying around the current \xi_k. By \delta\xi = H^{-1}b, it is basically saying that \xi_{k+1} = \delta\xi + \xi_k is locally the best point (derivative of the energy = 0). However, you didn't update \xi_k in this way, but updated it via exp(\delta\xi)exp(\xi_k) (Equation 2 in paper). However, this composition doesn't necessarily end up with the same SE(3) point (or se(3)) as the additive updating step.

My feeling is that there is a mismatch between the assumption of the Gauss-Newton method and your updating step. Could you provide more detailed reasoning about this?

Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant