Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use data from MathSciNet to update publications list #75

Open
2 of 4 tasks
haraldschilly opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 13 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

use data from MathSciNet to update publications list #75

haraldschilly opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 13 comments

Comments

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member

haraldschilly commented Jul 18, 2017

create library-publications-mathscinet.html page generated by the bib file.

@mmasdeu
Copy link

mmasdeu commented Jul 19, 2017

I have compiled all the publications in MathSciNet citing either "Sage Mathematics" or SageMath. Since MathSciNet is not friendly when giving back these data, the process is far from automatic...

all_sage_citations.zip

@williamstein
Copy link

the process is far from automatic...
= hour(s) of pain. Thanks @mmasdeu !

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

ok, wow, 727 publications are a lot. Any idea how we can reconcile this with what we already have? We can't just replace it, because there are potentially some publications in our list that aren't in this one and with some we e.g. link to the actual PDF file.

@mmasdeu
Copy link

mmasdeu commented Jul 19, 2017

I think that the list as it is now is not very useful in 2017. It is also very biased (because it requires extra steps from the authors). I would propose that it is kept as a legacy subpage as it is now, but the main page mirrors what can be found at MathSciNet at any given time (+- some months, until this can be properly automated). Any thoughts?

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

haraldschilly commented Jul 19, 2017

So, just to understand you correctly, you mean to remove much of the content that's on the current publications page? e.g. the first thesis "Martin Albrecht. Algebraic Attacks on the Courtois Toy Cipher" is not in the MathSciNet publications bibfile. It also to the thesis PDF itself being hosted on sagemath.org.

It's 2006, so I can understand you saying that this isn't useful, though. I just want to point this out as a detail to think about.

What we can definitely do is to start a new page "library-publications-mathscinet.html" and integrate this in it. Later, we can think about switching over, merging, etc...

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

Or, "H. C. Rhaly Jr. and B. E. Rhoades. The weighted mean operator on ℓ2ℓ2 with weight sequence ..." from 2014 would also be gone, since it's not in the MathSciNet list either.

@mmasdeu
Copy link

mmasdeu commented Jul 19, 2017 via email

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

ok, I've started to integrate this file. See #76 ... it currently fails with some encoding problems, though.

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

Several MRREVIEWER entries do contain wrongly encoded utf8, or some other issue. I've removed all of them. Let's see if this works.

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

Ok. #76 merged. There were also problems with some names. I don't know what's going on, but I fixed it in a way that it at least compiles. See: b0d1d5a for what I changed. Better ideas and closer review of how it is processed is welcome!

The follow up of this for the website itself is sagemath/website#112

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

ok, next step is to fix the special character translation table. i.e. we have to figure out how to display Mart\\'\\inez and some other names.

replace_special function here in https://github.com/sagemath/publications/blob/master/pubparse.py#L932

@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Mar 30, 2024

@haraldschilly - What is the status of this? I see that e.g. the 1st paper in mathscinet.bib does not seem to show up on the website.
Is mathscinet.bib not used in building the website?

@haraldschilly
Copy link
Member Author

@dimpase I don't know, I haven't looked into this since my last comment. Just by looking at my last comment, there seems to be work left to do, before this can be used. Hence, to your second question, the answer is no.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants