Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for other joint types #3

Open
juancamilog opened this issue Nov 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Support for other joint types #3

juancamilog opened this issue Nov 23, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@juancamilog
Copy link

Is there any reason why the joint types supported in the URDF format are not the same as the ones supported in the SDF format for gazebo?

I was hoping to define articulated to define models for simulation in gazebo, using the "universal", "revolute2" and "ball" joint types. This is for putting passive joints on articulated objects, to be manipulated by a robot arm.

@sloretz
Copy link
Contributor

sloretz commented Apr 4, 2018

Hi @juancamilog. Those sound like useful additions. I recommend starting a thread at https://discourse.ros.org/c/robot-description-formats

One thing to keep in mind is joint types with multiple degrees of freedom are difficult for tools relying on sensor_msgs/JointState since the message doesn't have a way to give a position on multiple axes. For example, joint_state_publisher ignores floating joints.

clalancette pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2019
* fix windows build

* add deprecated macro (#3)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants