You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any reason why the joint types supported in the URDF format are not the same as the ones supported in the SDF format for gazebo?
I was hoping to define articulated to define models for simulation in gazebo, using the "universal", "revolute2" and "ball" joint types. This is for putting passive joints on articulated objects, to be manipulated by a robot arm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One thing to keep in mind is joint types with multiple degrees of freedom are difficult for tools relying on sensor_msgs/JointState since the message doesn't have a way to give a position on multiple axes. For example, joint_state_publisher ignores floating joints.
Is there any reason why the joint types supported in the URDF format are not the same as the ones supported in the SDF format for gazebo?
I was hoping to define articulated to define models for simulation in gazebo, using the "universal", "revolute2" and "ball" joint types. This is for putting passive joints on articulated objects, to be manipulated by a robot arm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: