Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: R3 Supoort #887

Open
NeverMorewd opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[Feature]: R3 Supoort #887

NeverMorewd opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@NeverMorewd
Copy link

Describe the functionality desired 🐞

R3 Support
I realized that R3 offers a completely new implementation of Rx, and even the underlying interface has been redesigned.
But for the operation of collections, it also needs a supplement like DynamicData

The steps the functionality will provide

  1. Go to 'https://github.com/Cysharp/R3'

Considerations

Try R3 and DynamicData

@dwcullop
Copy link
Member

R3 is a radical shift in the way that it works. It isn't compatible with existing Rx code. So, it would be more like a hard-fork more than a DynamicData feature. If R3 catches on, then maybe we could host it in this org, but it would be its own repo, not part of this one.

@NeverMorewd
Copy link
Author

R3 is a radical shift in the way that it works. It isn't compatible with existing Rx code. So, it would be more like a hard-fork more than a DynamicData feature. If R3 catches on, then maybe we could host it in this org, but it would be its own repo, not part of this one.

Thank you for explanation. Looking forward to R3's popularity

@JakenVeina
Copy link
Collaborator

We definitely have some interest in R3, and I don't think we're against having an R3 implementation of DynamicData, that stands alongside the System.Reactive version. But we'd have to familiarize ourselves with R3 in general first. Which is something we've said we'd like to do. It'll be a matter of finding the time, someday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants