Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluating Monocular ORB-SLAM/ORB-SLAM2 on KITTI dataset #1

Open
gs14iitbbs opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Evaluating Monocular ORB-SLAM/ORB-SLAM2 on KITTI dataset #1

gs14iitbbs opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@gs14iitbbs
Copy link

gs14iitbbs commented Aug 24, 2018

Hi, I want to evaluate monocular ORB-SLAM or Monocular ORB-SLAM2 on KITTI driving dataset.
But the format of KITTI groundtruth is

timestamp a b c d e f g h i j k l

, while monocular ORB generates poses in TUM format

timestamp tx ty tz qx qy qz qw

I found this evaluate_rpe and evaluate_ate, which needs both to be in TUM format.

I tried converting keyframe poses from KITTI to TUM(quaternion) format, but got weird results. Can you please explain how to convert KITTI groundtruth poses to TUM format for such evaluation?

Also, the timestamps generated by monocular ORB-SLAM2 are very different from KITTI groundtruth timestamps.
I don't understand why?

@gs14iitbbs gs14iitbbs changed the title Hi , Evaluating Monocular ORB-SLAM/ORB-SLAM2 on KITTI dataset Aug 24, 2018
@zssjh
Copy link

zssjh commented Nov 13, 2018

@gs14iitbbs did you solved it?

@langelesl
Copy link

@gs14iitbbs @zssjh Same question. Have you found a way to evaluate the KeyFrameTrajectory.txt from Mono-Mode with the ground truth file of KITTI? Thanks.

@haliphinx
Copy link

haliphinx commented Mar 7, 2019

@gs14iitbbs @zssjh @langelesl I coded a brief python code to evaluate the mono ORB SLAM on KITTI based on this evaluate_ate_scale file. You can find my code here ORB_MONO_EVA.

@joshfriesen
Copy link

@haliphinx your code works wonderfully, thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants