Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for emulex ocs_fc_lio #72

Open
rlenkala opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for emulex ocs_fc_lio #72

rlenkala opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@rlenkala
Copy link

Hi,

So far we used with standard "rtslib" by providing spec file in /var/target/fabric/ to configure our Emulex OCS LIO targets. Now we wanted to use ocs_fc_lio kernel module driver with "rtslib-fc" module. We added code to support Emulex ocs_fc_lio driver in "fabric.py" and verified the code changes. Could you please review the attached patch and let me know if any modifications are required?

I also wanted to know the code check-in

process, I'm not sure if i can do commit at this time or not

Thanks,
Ravindar
rtslib-fb.txt

@agrover
Copy link
Contributor

agrover commented Mar 31, 2016

Hi Ravindar,

Very good to see this! We would need to wait to consider adding this until OCS LIO target is supported in the kernel.

@rlenkala
Copy link
Author

rlenkala commented Apr 1, 2016

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your review. Do you mean we need to upstream our OCS FC LIO driver in order to commit the required changes mentioned above in fabric.py ?

Thanks,
Ravindar

@agrover
Copy link
Contributor

agrover commented Apr 1, 2016

Yes. This will ensure we can test it properly now, and also in the future with future rtslib-fb changes.

@824380210
Copy link

does anybody know that emulex ocs_fc_lio can be use in rhels 7.3 or centos 1611 ? can anybody give me some example to use it , I want to use it in target mode to test the HBA card

@rlenkala
Copy link
Author

rlenkala commented Aug 29, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants