Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Forwarding Rules Manager implementation contract instead of the storage contract #34

Open
akolotov opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working deployment related to the deployment process external modules Related to contracts which are external w.r.t. to the omnibridge contracts fwd-rules Related to the Forwarding Rules Management

Comments

@akolotov
Copy link
Collaborator

Since the Forwarding Rules Manager specific to particular mediator it does not make sense to re-use its proxy storage address. Consider re-use the implementation contract instead.

console.log('\n[Home] Using existing Forwarding Rules Manager: ', forwardingRulesManager)

@akolotov akolotov added bug Something isn't working deployment related to the deployment process external modules Related to contracts which are external w.r.t. to the omnibridge contracts fwd-rules Related to the Forwarding Rules Management labels May 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working deployment related to the deployment process external modules Related to contracts which are external w.r.t. to the omnibridge contracts fwd-rules Related to the Forwarding Rules Management
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant