You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The calculator assumes a linear-return as the number of days progress towards the calculated Future Price. In reality, as that price is reached, the underlying fees generated have increased in value.
Take note here:
1 day position = $0.94 return
200 day position = $187.53 ($0.94 * 200)
In reality, the position would be generating MATIC and USDC, where MATIC is increasing in value. So a linear return isn't the ideal calculation here.
When the position of days is increased, I would expect to see the return of MATIC and USDC increase rather than stay the same - that way it could factor in increase in value.
Simpler way to view this problem
It's easier to visualise if you increase the Future price to be something extreme like $500 in future, across a 200 day position:
Take note of 1 day position, $0.94 yield, $1.5 future price
Take note of 200 day position, ONLY $187.53 yield, yet $500 future price
Clearly this doesn't make any sense. If your earning yield for 200 days generating MATIC and it's future price is $500 per MATIC, the yield wouldn't be only $187.53
Hope that makes sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The calculator assumes a linear-return as the number of days progress towards the calculated Future Price. In reality, as that price is reached, the underlying fees generated have increased in value.
Take note here:
1 day position = $0.94 return
200 day position = $187.53 ($0.94 * 200)
In reality, the position would be generating MATIC and USDC, where MATIC is increasing in value. So a linear return isn't the ideal calculation here.
When the position of days is increased, I would expect to see the return of MATIC and USDC increase rather than stay the same - that way it could factor in increase in value.
Simpler way to view this problem
It's easier to visualise if you increase the Future price to be something extreme like $500 in future, across a 200 day position:
Take note of 1 day position, $0.94 yield, $1.5 future price
Take note of 200 day position, ONLY $187.53 yield, yet $500 future price
Clearly this doesn't make any sense. If your earning yield for 200 days generating MATIC and it's future price is $500 per MATIC, the yield wouldn't be only $187.53
Hope that makes sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: