test_runner: t.after should respect the first-in-last-out principle like Golang's defer

[axetroy]

Version

v22.10.0

Platform

No response

Subsystem

No response

What steps will reproduce the bug?

1. Create a test file

import fs from 'node:fs'
import path from 'node:path'
import test from 'node:test'

test('basic', async (t) => {
    const testDir = path.join(import.meta.dirname, 'logs')

    fs.mkdirSync(testDir, { recursive: true })

    t.after(() => {
        console.log('remove test dir')
        fs.rmdirSync(testDir, { recursive: true })
    })

    fs.writeFileSync(path.join(testDir, 'test.log'), 'hello world!')

    t.after(() => {
        console.log('remove test file')
        fs.unlinkSync(path.join(testDir, 'test.log'))
    })

    // do staff...
})

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

None

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

t.after should follow the first-in, last-out principle

According to the above code, the file should be deleted first, then the directory

What do you see instead?

✖ basic (7.4021ms)
  Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, unlink 'project\folder\logs\test.log'
      at Object.unlinkSync (node:fs:1871:11)
      at TestContext.<anonymous> (file:///path/to/test.test.mjs:19:12)
      at TestHook.runInAsyncScope (node:async_hooks:211:14)
      at TestHook.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:934:25)
      at TestHook.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:1225:18)
      at TestHook.run (node:internal/util:543:20)
      at node:internal/test_runner/test:853:20
      at async Test.runHook (node:internal/test_runner/test:851:7)
      at async after (node:internal/test_runner/test:893:9)
      at async Test.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:942:7) {

Additional information

the first-in-last-out principle is more reasonable and practical. It is useful in many scenarios.

I'm not sure why it was designed in the form of a queue. Is there anything special about it?

[RedYetiDev]

IMO this code snippet is functioning as intended. The hooks are running in the order they were received.

I don't think we should reverse that order, as IMO it'll only cause confusion and breakages.

-1 from me