jetstream examples should be merged

[andrewgazelka]

Observed behavior

https://github.com/nats-io/nats.rs/blob/main/async-nats/examples/jetstream_push.rs
https://github.com/nats-io/nats.rs/blob/main/async-nats/examples/jetstream_pull.rs

are pretty much identical (from what I can tell)

Expected behavior

do not have duplicate examples (you should just have one)

Server and client version

not relevant

Host environment

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

[andrewgazelka]

probably not a defect. However, I did not know what to put this as.

[caspervonb]

Key difference is that they create different configs, e.g pull::Config vs push::Config, these give different implementations of the internals.

Pull example can probably be expanded to showcase fetch etc tho.

[andrewgazelka]

Key difference is that they create different configs, e.g pull::Config vs push::Config, these give different implementations of the internals.

Pull example can probably be expanded to showcase fetch etc tho.

ah I see... yea was hard for me to tell that was the difference but perhaps I did not look hard enough. wonder if this can be emphasized somehow.

[Jarema]

I agree with both of you:

1. We should add some comments.
2. We should use pull-specific method too.