Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return isodelay time in dzrf #104

Open
ShannonZ opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Return isodelay time in dzrf #104

ShannonZ opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ShannonZ
Copy link

ISODELAY time of a simulated RF pulse is needed to make it really useful.

What's I want
sigpy.mri.rf.slr.dzrf() return designed RF pulse and its isodelay.

@ShannonZ ShannonZ added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 20, 2021
@jonbmartin jonbmartin self-assigned this Dec 20, 2021
@jonbmartin
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed, this would be a useful thing for the function to deliver! In progress now.

@sidward
Copy link
Collaborator

sidward commented May 27, 2022

Hi @jonbmartin,

Wanted to check in: Any update on this?

@jonbmartin
Copy link
Collaborator

In progress! The function itself is actually written (PR #112) but fails checks, as it will require the updates to meet python 3.8 standards in PR #113. Working on that PR now.

@ShannonZ
Copy link
Author

ShannonZ commented Jun 1, 2022

@jonbmartin I cannot find any information about how to calculate the isodelay of a shaped pulse from the reference you given in the comments.
Bernstein, M.A. King, K.F. and Zhou, X.J. (2004). Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
IMOO, for symmetric pulses the isodelay is typically half the RF duration, for SLR or optimized RF pulses the isodelay further depends on the flip angle. I'm not sure whether or not it's just the duration from the peak to the end.
np.size(rf) - np.argmax(abs(rf)))*dt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants