Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[New Feature]: WinGet 1.9 Schema Documentation #191567

Open
denelon opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[New Feature]: WinGet 1.9 Schema Documentation #191567

denelon opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Issue-Docs It's a documentation issue that really should be on MicrosoftDocs
Milestone
1.9 Packages

Comments

@denelon
Copy link
Contributor

denelon commented Nov 14, 2024

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Add the new schema elements for 1.9 and add to: https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/tree/master/doc/manifest/schema

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

No response
@denelon denelon added the Issue-Docs It's a documentation issue that really should be on MicrosoftDocs label Nov 14, 2024
@denelon denelon added this to the 1.9 Packages milestone Nov 14, 2024
@denelon denelon added this to WinGet Nov 14, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs-Triage This work item needs to be triaged by a member of the core team. label Nov 14, 2024
@Trenly
Copy link
Contributor

Trenly commented Nov 14, 2024

I'm already working on this in a local branch :D

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot removed the Needs-Triage This work item needs to be triaged by a member of the core team. label Nov 14, 2024
@denelon denelon moved this to To Do in WinGet Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Issue-Docs It's a documentation issue that really should be on MicrosoftDocs
Projects
WinGet
Status: To Do
Milestone
1.9 Packages
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Trenly @denelon