You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the template reruns the scripts in different environments. Although it ensures that automate retraining process works, this functionality should be defined as an integration test on a sample set rather than a mean of promoting artefacts. The template needs to implement a process that download and reuploads artefacts to the next AML workspace. This will lower cost and time to production.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mariamedp does this mean that retraining is only performed in dev? In some architectures which require more secure separation of prod data, retraining in prod or pre-prod may be preferred.
Perhaps it would help if you could specify what you expect the artefacts to be :)
mariamedp
changed the title
Artefact migration from dev to prod AML workspace
Artefact migration between AML workspaces
Nov 11, 2022
We'll create a YAML template to support artefact migration between AML workspaces that can be easily used as part CI/CD pipelines.
We'll build a new modeling pipeline PIPELINE-1b-modeling-<name tbd>.yml to showcase the flow of artifact migration. The reason for this is that this will be a more complex pipeline and won't be needed in all cases, so we'll have it as separate example.
The example pipeline will incorporate a third environment, TEST. Changes against any feature branch will be triggered in DEV as in 1-modeling. Changes against main will be triggered in TEST first, then the model artifact will be migrated to PROD, and deployment will happen in PROD as well. Moving from DEV to PROD is not a safe practice since artifacts in DEV have not been generated with code in the main branch, so that's why we avoid showcasing that flow in the template and use a third TEST env instead.
This will also allow us to show the flow of having a sequence of environments TEST -> (...) -> PROD to be used against the same branch (main), which is a functionality that has been on our radar since the beginning, and I believe was requested here as well Feature Request - Provide High Level Deployment method to higher environments #65.
My suggestion for pipeline name: PIPELINE-1b-modeling-with-TEST-env.yml.
Currently the template reruns the scripts in different environments. Although it ensures that automate retraining process works, this functionality should be defined as an integration test on a sample set rather than a mean of promoting artefacts. The template needs to implement a process that download and reuploads artefacts to the next AML workspace. This will lower cost and time to production.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: