Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a product, I want the alpha to be on the Canary Network #128

Open
pkucherenk0 opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

As a product, I want the alpha to be on the Canary Network #128

pkucherenk0 opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pkucherenk0
Copy link
Contributor

pkucherenk0 commented Nov 28, 2023

Problem to solve: It was agreed that the Alpa will be released on the Canary (network placeholder) main-net network. This should make Alpha more influential for testers, the team, and the community. Allowing us to transit to the main-net more easily, and find the issues and abuses prior to the public release. This will create adoption metrics for VC

Acceptance Criteria:

  1. Deploy bridge DUCKIES (as a safety token) to (network placeholder) L1+L2
  2. Index Price feed should support the market list on the (network placeholder)
  3. ClearPort should be able to operate on (network placeholder)
  4. ClearSync SC should be deployed and operation on (network placeholder) L2
  5. User should connect his wallet on the (network placeholder)
@pkucherenk0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Depends on the Business backlog and what network we will choose. Deadline December 13

@mod mod assigned calj Dec 13, 2023
@mod
Copy link
Contributor

mod commented Dec 13, 2023

We can deploy anytime using our hardhat task but blocked by making a secure deploy:
https://www.openzeppelin.com/#secure-deploy

@mod
Copy link
Contributor

mod commented Dec 13, 2023

TODO:

  • @mnaichuk Index price
  • @dpatsora Integrate pkg/quote
  • @calj Secure deploy for adjudicator and maybe DUCKIES ERC20
  • Study ERC20 bridging from L1 - L2 (optimism)

@calj
Copy link
Contributor

calj commented Dec 14, 2023

I started a PR with a first attempt to use OpenZepplin Deploy
#138

I think the product allows to do what we want, if we can make it work.
I theory we can validate deployments and updates with a multi-sign contract.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants