You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for your great code, I am confused about accuracy with or without finetune on CIFAR-10-4K.
Results show that accuracy with and without finetune on CIFAR-10-4K are 96.01% and 96.08%, which means there is no significant increase of accuracy with finetune. And I wonder is it means we could use only unlabeled data (with pseudo label generated by teacher model) to train our student model and obtain accuracy almost equal to train it with labeled data? So it indicates indirectly that pseudo labels generated by teacher model are high-quality?
I would appreciated if you could give me a response. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your great code, I am confused about accuracy with or without finetune on CIFAR-10-4K.
Results show that accuracy with and without finetune on CIFAR-10-4K are 96.01% and 96.08%, which means there is no significant increase of accuracy with finetune. And I wonder is it means we could use only unlabeled data (with pseudo label generated by teacher model) to train our student model and obtain accuracy almost equal to train it with labeled data? So it indicates indirectly that pseudo labels generated by teacher model are high-quality?
I would appreciated if you could give me a response. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: