Replies: 1 comment
-
Creating a local imtoolrc is usually unnecessary and dangerous, because its entries must match the assumtions IRAF has about the device. Specifically your single line makes the first configuration of ximtool as a 2048x2048 image, while IRAF still assumes a 512x512 image, which results in the image you ave shown.
However, the use of SAOImageDS9 may be the better choice, as this program is much more flexible than ximtool. As this is not a bug, I moved it into the discussion forum. Finally, if you are just going to start using IRAF: It is not recommended to start new projects using IRAF nowadays, unless it is really unavoidable IRAF is an old package without institutional support and a shrinking user and maintainer base. Instead, it is really better to use f.e. the Astropy ecosystem which is already a good alternative for many use cases instead of investing time into a depcreated software tool. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I recently installed the X11IRAF using the installer (Intel 64 bit) in a Mac laptop with Big Sur 11.7.8. IRAF works great (i.e., apall, imcombine, imarith, splot...), however, the ximtool displays only a section of 512x512 pixels if I attempt to use the imexam or display tasks.
I looked at the ximtool help and found that a different size can be defined by creating an .imtoolrc file in my home directory. Following the instructions I create this file and add the following line inside:
1 2 2048 2048
As a result, when I display an 2048x2048-pixel image, the tool shows slices of the image as the attached screenshot. I tried with different sizes in the .imtoolrc file, but it is always the same result with the exception of the 512x512 size, which shows a clipped version of the image.
Might you have any clue on what's going on here? I guess it's a stupid mistake, but I cannot figure it out. Thank you very much in advance for any help that you could provide!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions