You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since they modify the allocation in place, they're unusable e.g. in the array. Consider the expression ary2 = ary.with_queue(None), which one might think should unbind underlying SVM from the queue. But ary is still ailve, and both ary and ary2 refer to the same allocation.
Instead, we need some sort of "holder" object that inserts a queue into a list of queues that need to be synchronized with when freeing the SVM.
Since they modify the allocation in place, they're unusable e.g. in the array. Consider the expression
ary2 = ary.with_queue(None)
, which one might think should unbind underlying SVM from the queue. Butary
is still ailve, and bothary
andary2
refer to the same allocation.Instead, we need some sort of "holder" object that inserts a queue into a list of queues that need to be synchronized with when freeing the SVM.
cc @matthiasdiener
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: