Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for these suggestions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for these suggestions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @Martin-Jung!
I have a question about the function
add_predictors_model
, concerning the possibility of adding a model built on a larger scale to a model at a local scale. This would be needed to avoid some common problems (i.e., niche truncation). I am now working on models at a continental scale (Africa) and I would like to use these models (or the final ensemble model, but maybe it's not possible to add ensemble model as predictor model) as a predictor for a local scale model (in Namibia). If this function doesn't support the inclusion of models at different scales, I could crop the global-scale model and use the resulting cropped model as a simple predictor instead. I didn't try this process yet because currently I am working to obtain the global scale models.Moreover, I have noticed two problems using the function
validate
andeffects
. Specifically, using the function evaluate I never obtained a score for Continuous Boyce index which returns NA, while other indexes are computed. I tried bothvalidate(mod, method = "continuous")
andvalidate(mod, method = "continuous", point = test1, point_column = "pres_abs")
.For the functions
effects
, I was able to obtain the graph reported in the reference site on GitHub (e.g., 'Train a basic model') only the first time, and then I got different graphs (for example, using xgboost engine) or strange errors.Lastly, I would very much support the creation of a function to implement different types of cross-validation during the modeling and validation phases.
Thank you for your support!
Best whishes,
Davide
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions