-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"KPP integration failed!" with GCClassic 14.4.3 #2524
Comments
Hi,Hello, I realised that I was using fullchem's Restart before, so reused carbon's Restart (http://geoschemdata.wustl.edu/ExtData/GEOSCHEM_RESTARTS/v2023-01/), but still the same problem: KPP integration failed |
Hi Liyl2, are you able to run with the out-of-the-box code, without rebuilding KPP? |
Hi @lizziel , I ran the source code without rebuilding KPP, it was the same problem, and I was confused because of it. |
Could you try a 72 level run, with verbose turned on in |
I have also tried the 72 level carbon simulation, still the same problem. I have been using GCClassic 14.0.2 before, and it worked fine. This is my first time trying the carbon mechanism, and it is strange that even the most primitive code cannot run. |
I also tried fullchem simulation and CH4 simulation based on GCClassic v14.0.3, they are worked well. However, using the carbon mechanism to simulate CO2 does not work either, so it seems to be a problem with the carbon mechanism, but there is no ERROR at compile time, which has puzzled me for a long time. I want to add species to the carbon mechanism, so need to go through the carbon mechanism. Maybe you can give me some tips on what to check first. Thanks! |
Could you include your entire log file here? If you add extension |
Also, did you build with |
I am tagging @msulprizio on this since she fixing some problems with the carbon simulation. However, I don't think the problems involved KPP integration errors. Melissa, have you seen this issue before? |
I have not encountered this error. Our carbon simulations are regularly passing integration tests (i.e. they run successfully for 1-hour for carbon, carbon-CH4 only, carbon-CO2 only, and carbon-CO only). @Liyl2 I would recommend following suggestions in our debug guide to see if you can identify the issue. This would include seeing if you can run with the out-of-the-box configuration, turning on debug output to log files, etc. You may also want to try running with the As Lizzie mentions above, I am working on additional fixes for CO2 in the carbon simulation in #2510. Those fixed will go into version 14.5.1, but the carbon simulation should run even without those fixes -- CO2 will just be wrong. |
Hi, @msulprizio Thanks for your suggestion. I was going to use the GDB debugger to find my error, but when I used Debug mode it successfully ran the carbon mechanism based on GCClassic 14.4.3! Although the Release version still do not work. Is there a big difference between Debug and Release versions? Can I run it in Debug? |
Your name
Yali LI
Your affiliation
Southern University of Science and Technology
What happened? What did you expect to happen?
Hello, I'm running carbon mechanism (CH4 only) based on GCClassic v14.4.3, but I'm having problems: KPP integration failed!
I rebuilt the carbon mechanism with the latest KPP version 3.1.1 although no changes have been made (. /build_mechanism.sh carbon,) and the carbon mechanism is as low as v2.5.0, which I think is sufficient. Other than that, I simply did the following configurations:
I also tried using the KPP v2.5.0 version and still have the same problem. Had the same problem with GCClassic 14.3.1.
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
KPP mechanism rebuilt, GC compiles all fine. Bugs appear after committing tasks.
Please attach any relevant configuration and log files.
GC.log
geoschem_config.yml.txt
HEMCO_Config.rc.txt
HISTORY.rc.txt
summarize_build.txt
What GEOS-Chem version were you using?
GCClassic 14.4.3
What environment were you running GEOS-Chem on?
Local cluster
What compiler and version were you using?
gcc 11.2.0,ifort18.0.5
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
Yes
In what configuration were you running GEOS-Chem?
GCClassic
What simulation were you running?
Carbon
As what resolution were you running GEOS-Chem?
4x5°,47L
What meterology fields did you use?
MERRA-2
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: