-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obsoletion request: GO:0006268 DNA unwinding involved in DNA replication #29153
Comments
To be sure. We want to obsolete all child terms as well.
|
This is right. We should also obsolete the parent GO:0032508 DNA duplex unwinding, since this is a single-step process (= DNA helicase activity), and the regulation terms:
and regulation of DNA helicase activity: (this is covered by another ticket #22455 but since there are few annotations (3 EXP), we can deal with these now):
|
|
We should also obsolete
|
@pgaudet Should these also be obsoleted?
|
Yes ! I'm not sure what the G duplex is though. Should there be a process
to capture that?
Le ven. 15 nov. 2024, 19:13, Raymond Lee ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… @pgaudet <https://github.com/pgaudet> Should these also be obsoleted?
- GO:0000717 nucleotide-excision repair, DNA duplex unwinding
- GO:0044806 G-quadruplex DNA unwinding
- GO:1905466 negative regulation of G-quadruplex DNA unwinding
- GO:1905467 positive regulation of G-quadruplex DNA unwinding
- GO:1905465 regulation of G-quadruplex DNA unwinding
- GO:0036292 DNA rewinding
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#29153 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABEPWUERQIGY2UVFSQCELET2AY2V5AVCNFSM6AAAAABREKK24KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZXG4YDONRWGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
PMID:25653156 via the action of a DEAH-box ATP-dependent helicase. |
Please provide as much information as you can:
GO:0006268 DNA unwinding involved in DNA replication
"Replace by" term (ID and label)
If all annotations can safely be moved to that term
"Consider" term(s) (ID and label)
Suggestions for reannotation
Are there annotations to this term?
Are there mappings and cross references to this term? (InterPro, Keywords; check QuickGO cross-references section)
Is this term in a subset? (check the AmiGO page for that term)
Any other information
Checklist for ontology editor
Check term usage and metadata in Protégé
Check annotations
Notification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: