-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regression for Hyla Laurenti, 1768 #273
Comments
In COL there are 2 accepted Hyla genera from ITIS, both with species. Maybe that it the reason: The problematic authorship comes from Plazi: https://www.gbif.org/species/176230819 |
|
There are likely many more cases like this one coming from COL, see issue linked above |
We actually try to catch those by merging all accepted genera from the same source that have the same parent, e.g. family. Homonyms can exist across distant parts of the tree, but not as accepted sibling genera. In this case one sits under a subfamily though, the other one directly under the family which causes them not to be detected. |
The new backbone treats it fine again: http://backbonebuild-vh.gbif.org:9000/species/match?verbose=true&name=Hyla |
is marked doubtful while Hyla Quoyi-Hyla Prasina Case took over.
http://backbonebuild-vh.gbif.org:9000/species/match?verbose=true&name=Hyla
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: