Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regression for Hyla Laurenti, 1768 #273

Open
mdoering opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Regression for Hyla Laurenti, 1768 #273

mdoering opened this issue Jul 4, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@mdoering
Copy link
Member

mdoering commented Jul 4, 2023

is marked doubtful while Hyla Quoyi-Hyla Prasina Case took over.
http://backbonebuild-vh.gbif.org:9000/species/match?verbose=true&name=Hyla

{
  "count": 6654,
  "verbatim_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "verbatim_phylum": "Chordata",
  "verbatim_class": "Amphibia",
  "verbatim_order": "Anura",
  "verbatim_family": "Hylidae",
  "verbatim_genus": "Hyla",
  "verbatim_species": "null",
  "verbatim_infra": "null",
  "verbatim_rank": "genus",
  "verbatim_verbatimRank": "null",
  "verbatim_scientificName": "Hyla",
  "verbatim_generic": "null",
  "verbatim_author": "null",
  "current_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "current_phylum": "Chordata",
  "current_class": "Amphibia",
  "current_order": "Anura",
  "current_family": "Hylidae",
  "current_genus": "Hyla",
  "current_subGenus": "null",
  "current_species": "null",
  "current_scientificName": "Hyla Laurenti, 1768",
  "current_acceptedScientificName": "Hyla Laurenti, 1768",
  "current_kingdomKey": 1,
  "current_phylumKey": 44,
  "current_classKey": 131,
  "current_orderKey": 952,
  "current_familyKey": 6735,
  "current_genusKey": 2423589,
  "current_subGenusKey": "null",
  "current_speciesKey": "null",
  "current_taxonKey": 2423589,
  "current_acceptedTaxonKey": 2423589,
  "proposed_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "proposed_phylum": "Chordata",
  "proposed_class": "Amphibia",
  "proposed_order": "Anura",
  "proposed_family": "Hylidae",
  "proposed_genus": "Hyla",
  "proposed_subGenus": "null",
  "proposed_species": "null",
  "proposed_scientificName": "Hyla Quoyi-Hyla Prasina Case",
  "proposed_acceptedScientificName": "Hyla Quoyi-Hyla Prasina Case",
  "proposed_kingdomKey": 1,
  "proposed_phylumKey": 44,
  "proposed_classKey": 131,
  "proposed_orderKey": 952,
  "proposed_familyKey": 6735,
  "proposed_genusKey": 7404296,
  "proposed_subGenusKey": "null",
  "proposed_speciesKey": "null",
  "proposed_taxonKey": 7404296,
  "proposed_acceptedTaxonKey14932": 7404296,
  "_key": 7415,
  "changes": {
    "genusKey": true,
    "scientificName": true,
    "acceptedScientificName": true,
    "taxonKey": true
  },
  "reviewed": false
}
@mdoering mdoering added the bug label Jul 4, 2023
@mdoering
Copy link
Member Author

mdoering commented Jul 4, 2023

In COL there are 2 accepted Hyla genera from ITIS, both with species. Maybe that it the reason:
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9910/taxon/4ZYM
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9910/taxon/4ZYL

The problematic authorship comes from Plazi: https://www.gbif.org/species/176230819

@mdoering
Copy link
Member Author

mdoering commented Jul 4, 2023

DEBUG [07-02 02:23:20,332+0000] [main] org.gbif.checklistbank.nub.NubBuilder: process dataset c35887df ACCEPTED GENUS Hyla QUOYI – HYLA PRASINA CASE
DEBUG [07-02 02:23:20,333+0000] [main] org.gbif.checklistbank.nub.NubBuilder: Updating Hyla from source Hyla QUOYI – HYLA PRASINA CASE
DEBUG [07-02 02:23:20,333+0000] [main] org.gbif.checklistbank.nub.NubBuilder: Updating nomenclature for Hyla from source Hyla QUOYI – HYLA PRASINA CASE
INFO [07-02 02:23:20,337+0000] [main] org.gbif.checklistbank.nub.NubBuilder: Processing 0 explicit basionym relations from The Hyla quoyi-Hyla prasina case (Amphibia, Anura), with comments on bibliographic and taxonomic databases and on Article 23.9 of the Co

@mdoering
Copy link
Member Author

mdoering commented Jul 5, 2023

There are likely many more cases like this one coming from COL, see issue linked above

@mdoering
Copy link
Member Author

mdoering commented Jul 5, 2023

We actually try to catch those by merging all accepted genera from the same source that have the same parent, e.g. family. Homonyms can exist across distant parts of the tree, but not as accepted sibling genera.

In this case one sits under a subfamily though, the other one directly under the family which causes them not to be detected.

@mdoering
Copy link
Member Author

The new backbone treats it fine again: http://backbonebuild-vh.gbif.org:9000/species/match?verbose=true&name=Hyla

@mdoering mdoering added this to the Backbone 2023 milestone Jul 10, 2023
@mdoering mdoering modified the milestones: Backbone 2023, Backbone 2024 Aug 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant