Usage of target_options vs storage_options #1252
-
I am facing some issues using fsspec within pandas to read parquet file from S3.
However when I do not specify the filesystem and I let fsspec create one I get an exception from aiobotocore.
The target_options argument is introduced by the url_to_fs function. I am a bit confused on what is exactly that I am doing wrong. Why does the url_to_fs function add the target_options argument whereas the fsspec.filesystem uses storage_options? is there a way to get the read_paquet function to work without explicitly specifying the filesystem? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Using pd.read_parquet is certainly the normal route used by most people. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I see three "/" characters where there should be only two. Is this real, or just transcription error? It could explain what you are seeing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
(to be sure, I tried a similar read_parquet and it worked OK for me)