-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow spdx and other license schemes? #855
Comments
For example, the REUSE standard uses SPDX: |
@peterdesmet It doesn't look that Open Definition is actively maintained so it might be a huge limitation for Data Package authors, isn't it? |
I don't know what the state is of the Open Definition, but if it is indeed not maintained than we should opt for an alternative. SPDX - which I am not familiar with - is indeed a good candidate:
|
After comparing Opendefinition with SPDX:
All in all, I think we can recommend SPDX for the license |
@peterdesmet |
Overview
For example,
spdx
is often used in other metadata systems.Example from Datacite notation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: