Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Test Answers in CLEVR #2

Open
Victoria2333 opened this issue Oct 22, 2017 · 21 comments
Open

Test Answers in CLEVR #2

Victoria2333 opened this issue Oct 22, 2017 · 21 comments

Comments

@Victoria2333
Copy link

I sent an email with my test file to @jcjohnson, i would like to know how long it will take for reply???
Thank for your attention~~~

@jcjohnson
Copy link

We followed up via email.

For others viewing this thread in the future, test-set answers should be formatted as a text file with one answer per line, in the same order as the questions in the JSON file; I will then evaluate using this script:

https://gist.github.com/jcjohnson/5796ff43e67835cb8e1de882a5867994

@Victoria2333
Copy link
Author

Thank you, i will modify my file format and send it to you later~~~

@Victoria2333
Copy link
Author

@jcjohnson
Hi, do I need to include the other variables such as question_id to know which predicted answer is corresponding with the question?? However,it seems that it is enough to offer predicted answers in json file??And the answers are not sored in list,just need to be written in??
Thank you for attention~

@jcjohnson
Copy link

@Victoria2333 As mentioned above, your test-set answer should be a text file with one answer per line; you do not need to include question IDs. Please refer to the script I linked; you can make sure your file format is correct by using my script to evaluate your answers on the validation set.

@Victoria2333
Copy link
Author

I have already sent to you,
Looking forward to your reply~

@TimeLighter
Copy link

Dear Justin.
I have sent a request for evaluation of the test answer in CLEVR.
Thanks in advance for your help.

@jcjohnson
Copy link

@TimeLighter I think I've responded to all pending test-set requests; please let me know if you still need test set results.

@TimeLighter
Copy link

I got your email.
Thanks a lot :)

@TimeLighter
Copy link

Hi.
I sent one more request with email. (modelC_test_answer.txt)
I'm looking forward your replay.
Thank you.

@cyhbrilliant
Copy link

@jcjohnson
Hi Justin:
I have already sent you a email with test_24_18.txt attachment file for evaluation about CLEVR 1.0, could you please replay as soon as possible.
Thank you : ).

@jcjohnson
Copy link

@cyhbrilliant I responded via email

@cyhbrilliant
Copy link

@jcjohnson
Thanks Justin:
We‘ve seen that, and another two files send to you.
Looking forward your reply, thanks very much.

@yuzcccc
Copy link

yuzcccc commented Mar 18, 2019

@jcjohnson
Hi, johnson,
I just send a mail to you to test CLEVR results. Hope to get a results soon. Thanks!

@vmichals
Copy link

@jcjohnson Sent an email requesting some test results. Hoping to get them soon. Thanks!

@YL1113
Copy link

YL1113 commented Feb 28, 2020

@jcjohnson
Hi, johnson,
I tried to test my latest VQA system in CLEVR_v1.0 dataset. I just send a mail to you to test CLEVR results. could you please reply me the results as soon as possible. very thanks!
submit_answer.txt

@ArrasL
Copy link

ArrasL commented Mar 2, 2020

Hi Justin,
we sent you an email last week to your umich dot edu address with our test answers. We hope that's the right way to get the test accuracy ;-)
Thanks in advance!

@jcjohnson
Copy link

@YL1113 @ArrasL replied over email

@benbogin
Copy link

We have just sent you our predictions as well and would appreciate your response, thanks so much!

@cengzy14
Copy link

cengzy14 commented Nov 16, 2020

@jcjohnson
Hi, johnson,
I just send a mail to you to test CLEVR results (pred_mymodel_test.txt). Hope to get a result soon. Thanks a lot!
(Sorry for send two emails via different email addresses, you can just reply one. Thanks in advance!

@jcjohnson
Copy link

@cengzy14 I replied on email. Good luck on CVPR!

@cengzy14
Copy link

@cengzy14 I replied on email. Good luck on CVPR!

got it! thank you for your kindness! : )

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants