Discrepancies in citation format when using citar-insert-reference

[benthamite]

Apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but I notice that when I insert a formatted reference with citar-insert-reference, there are various discrepancies between the inserted reference and the same reference as it appears when exported with one of the org-mode export commands, such as org-md-export-to-markdown. Most notably, the titles are not capitalized correctly (e.g. the braces surrounding a word are not respected).

As an example, consider the following bibtex entry:

@online{Hanson2023CanHumansBe,
  abstract =	 {It is one of the most fundamental questions in the
                  social and human sciences: how culturally plastic are
                  people? Many anthropologists have long championed the
                  view that humans are very plastic; with matching
                  upbringing people can be made to behave a very wide
                  range of ways, and to want a very wide range of
                  things. Others say human nature is far more
                  constrained, and collect descriptions of "human
                  universals" (See Brown's 1991},
  author =	 {Hanson, Robin},
  langid =	 {english},
  timestamp =	 {2023-06-14 15:12:51 (GMT)},
  title =	 {Can humans be the {FORTRAN} of creatures?},
  url =
                  {https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml},
  urldate =	 {2023-06-14},
}

Inserting this reference by invoking citar-insert-reference results in

[1]R. Hanson, “Can humans be the fortran of creatures?” https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml (accessed Jun. 14, 2023).

Whereas exporting a file that cites that work via org-md-export-to-markdown will show it in the "bibliography" section as

R. Hanson, “Can humans be the FORTRAN of creatures?” https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml (accessed Jun. 14, 2023).

I have used the IEEE csl citation style in this case, but the issue occurs with all the styles I tried.

[bdarcus]

Are you using the default formatter, or the citeproc-el one?

I realize it's not documented in the README (PR welcome), but I suspect that's it; either you aren't using the citeproc formatter, or you're using a different style for that?

[benthamite]

Thanks for the quick reply.

In my config, the values of citar-citeproc-csl-styles-dir and citar-citeproc-csl-locales-dir are set to org-cite-csl-styles-dir and org-cite-csl-locales-dir, respectively, and citar-format-reference-function is set to citar-citeproc-format-reference. Finally, citar-citeproc-select-csl-style is set to ieee.csl, which is a file that exists in citar-citeproc-csl-styles-dir. Is there anything else that needs to be done for citar-citeproc.el to work properly?

In case it helps understand what might be going on, I interned citar-citeproc-format-reference and copied the output of each step in the evaluation to the attached file.

debugger-output.txt

[bdarcus]

OK.

To go back to this:

Most notably, the titles are not capitalized correctly (e.g. the braces surrounding a word are not respected.

Here we're using the citar cache, which we populated using parsebib-parse with the display option, rather than parsing the bib on its own. That strips intra-field markup.

Obviously that enhances responsiveness, at the expense of some correctness.

Not sure if there's an easy way to resolve that, or if we could make it configurable.

[bdarcus]

@benthamite can you confirm my hunch in my last reply?

[benthamite]

Apologies, I hadn't seen your previous message. I should be able to look into this within the next couple of days.

[benthamite]

Hi @bdarcus,

For testing purposes, I created bibliography.bib:

@online{Hanson2023CanHumansBe,
  abstract =	 {It is one of the most fundamental questions in the
                  social and human sciences: how culturally plastic are
                  people? Many anthropologists have long championed the
                  view that humans are very plastic; with matching
                  upbringing people can be made to behave a very wide
                  range of ways, and to want a very wide range of
                  things. Others say human nature is far more
                  constrained, and collect descriptions of "human
                  universals" (See Brown's 1991},
  author =	 {Hanson, Robin},
  langid =	 {english},
  timestamp =	 {2023-06-14 15:12:51 (GMT)},
  title =	 {Can humans be the {FORTRAN} of creatures?},
  url =
                  {https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml},
  urldate =	 {2023-06-14},
}

and config.el:

(setq org-cite-global-bibliography '("bibliography.bib"))
(setq org-cite-export-processors
      '((t . (csl "ieee.csl"))))
(setq citar-bibliography '("bibliography.bib"))

After evaluating the latter, I evaluate (citar-citeproc--itemgetter '("Hanson2023CanHumansBe")), which returns

(("Hanson2023CanHumansBe" (URL . "https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml") (title . "Can humans be the fortran of creatures?") (blt-type . "online") (type . "webpage") (language . "en-US") (abstract . "It is one of the most fundamental questions in the social and human sciences: how culturally plastic are people? Many anthropologists have long championed the view that humans are very plastic; with matching upbringing people can be made to behave a very wide range of ways, and to want a very wide range of things. Others say human nature is far more constrained, and collect descriptions of \"human universals\" (See Brown’s 1991") (author ((family . "Hanson") (given . "Robin"))) (accessed (date-parts (2023 6 14)))))

By contrast, if I create document.org

[cite:@Hanson2023CanHumansBe]

#+print_bibliography:

and run org-md-export-to-markdown, I get

<a href="#citeproc_bib_item_1">[1]</a>  

<style>.csl-left-margin{float: left; padding-right: 0em;}
 .csl-right-inline{margin: 0 0 0 1em;}</style><div class="csl-bib-body">
  <div class="csl-entry"><a id="citeproc_bib_item_1"></a>
    <div class="csl-left-margin">[1]</div><div class="csl-right-inline">R. Hanson, “Can humans be the FORTRAN of creatures?” <a href="https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml">https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/how-plastic-are-peoplehtml</a> (accessed Jun. 14, 2023).</div>
  </div>
</div>

As you can see, the word "FORTRAN" is in all caps in the exported Markdown, but not in the output of (citar-citeproc--itemgetter '("Hanson2023CanHumansBe")).

I'm not entirely sure this is the kind of test you wanted me to run. Please let me know if there's anything else I should do. I'm attaching the relevant files in case it helps you reproduce the issue.
files.zip

[bdarcus]

Thanks.

I'm almost certain my assumption is correct; that using our cache for the formatting means the TeX markup gets stripped before citeproc sees it.

Still not sure what we can, or should, do about that.

[leinfink]

I wanted to bump this, as I just stumbled upon the same issue.

[leinfink]

Maybe a quick fix would just be a manual (prefix) toggle whether to use the cache or not?

[leinfink]

Oh, nevermind, I think that was just an issue with a CSL style. Am I right in assuming that this got fixed, actually?

[bdarcus]

Nothing changed on this end.

And I should clarify: it's not per se the cache, but rather that we use parsebib-parse with the display option to populate it.

We would do the same without a cache, and the alternative would be us parsing the input.