[FEATURE] Compatibility with djade

[rphlo]

• I've searched the issues
• I've read the docs

Feature Request

Hi, First thanks for this project,
Here is my request.

Recently a new project was released https://github.com/adamchainz/djade and it has conflicting formatting rules regarding django jinja templates.
Biggest conflict is regarding white lines around {% block %}, smaller conflict is about naming inlines {% endblock %}

Would be nice to see a common approach regarding those.

I posted a feature request as well in djade repo.
adamchainz/djade#101

[monosans]

What is the point of this? What will it give to djLint and djade users?

[rphlo]

For users that uses both projects (both projects checks are not overlapping completely), it will allow to get a passing tests when committing their code, otherwise there will be always one linter complaining of the output of the other.

[monosans]

Why would anyone use 2 formatters for the same file type

[rphlo]

Djade formats only jinja specific blocks, while djLint formats the html.

[oliverhaas]

Why not use djlint for everything? If you want "compatibility", you actually would need to implement the same formatting in djlint, basically making using djade superfluous.

I don't know what formatting djlint is currently missing, or if there are just minor differences. Can you give an actual example for formatting conflicts?