We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, I've seen this work by Intel: https://github.com/intel/scikit-learn-intelex and curious if anyone has looked into how it may compare / if it can be used as a speed up for nndescent? There is an example notebook here showing the speedup on a toy example: https://www.kaggle.com/kppetrov/fast-knn-using-scikit-learn-intelex-for-mnist - i believe there are also additional hooks for GPU methods: https://intel.github.io/scikit-learn-intelex/gpu.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the suggestion! We haven't looked into speeding up the nearest neighbor computation.
For speeding up nndescent in particular, I would suggest moving this discussion to the pynndescent Github repository.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi, I've seen this work by Intel: https://github.com/intel/scikit-learn-intelex and curious if anyone has looked into how it may compare / if it can be used as a speed up for nndescent? There is an example notebook here showing the speedup on a toy example: https://www.kaggle.com/kppetrov/fast-knn-using-scikit-learn-intelex-for-mnist - i believe there are also additional hooks for GPU methods: https://intel.github.io/scikit-learn-intelex/gpu.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: