Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow SR to copy message when specific value is set to True by Autonomous Agent that is used to gather facts #151

Open
antonioodunuga1 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@antonioodunuga1
Copy link

We use an autonomous agent to gather facts and populate a facts file where the contents get added to a message on the choria registration stream and is used to monitor our fleet nodes.

We already use the sampling use cases that SR abides by but we want SR to replicate messages through an additional scenario ie:

Add another option where if our autonomous agents puts a specific value to true in the facts we will unconditionally copy it. This way our autonomous agent can tell us when there is a significant change.

This will allow us to replicate messages not only when the message has increased significantly in size but also when the contents of the file has changed

ripienaar added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
Adds the new inspect_force_field setting that can combine with inspect_field
to force copying of specific messages

Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
ripienaar added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
Adds the new inspect_force_field setting that can combine with inspect_field
to force copying of specific messages

Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
ripienaar added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
Adds the new inspect_force_field setting that can combine with inspect_field
to force copying of specific messages

Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
ripienaar added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
(#151) Support forcing limiter bypass based on json field
@ripienaar
Copy link
Member

@antonioodunuga1 I did this as described in this PR here #153 let me know what yous think

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants