Any future?

[dumblob]

The language seems interesting because of light syntax, FFI and its programmability. Despite it's utter slowness, I'd like to know whether there are any plans to continue?

Btw. you might be interested in Basil as it syntactically and with its programmability slightly resembles Lever.

[cheery]

No plans to continue on lever. pe 7. toukok. 2021 klo 14.17 dumblob ***@***.***> kirjoitti:

…

The language seems interesting because of light syntax, FFI and its programmability. Despite it's utter slowness, I'd like to know whether there are any plans to continue? Btw. you might be interested in Basil <https://github.com/basilTeam/basil> as it syntactically and with its programmability slightly resembles Lever. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJIXPEZUDCAJKCYZZK3X43TMPD4FANCNFSM44JSN5PA> .

[dumblob]

Ok, closing. Cheers anyway - it must have been quite a lot of effort!

[dumblob]

Btw. I finally found some time to read a few of your blog posts and I understood you were (still are?) looking for a language which seamlessly supports runtime typing ("dynamic" typing) as well as static typing (both AOT typing as "partial correctness ensurance" and AOT compilation to native binary as "performance ensurance").

If that's correct, then we share this vision 😉. In such case you might be interested in XL (read its history as its kind of important and see some examples of versatility: c3d/xl#43 (comment) ).