You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I can understand, CF-convention has no restrictions on the order of dimensions, but recommends using the order (time, depth/height/z, y, x)
But is there a recommendation/requirement for the order of the additional ensemble/realization dimension for output from ensemble ocean or atmospheric models?
E.g. (ensemble_number, time, depth/height/z, y, x) or (time, depth/height/z, ensemble_number, y, x) ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know of any such recommendation or requirement, but I personally would go for (ensemble_number, time, depth/height/z, y, x) on the grounds that, depending on your access patterns, netCDF may be faster when the dimensions are ordered from slowest moving to fastest moving, left to right.
There is such a recommendation in the second paragraph of section 2.4. "All other dimensions should, whenever possible, be placed to the left of the spatiotemporal dimensions." This is in accordance with the COARDS recommendation for ordering of additional dimensions.
As far as I can understand, CF-convention has no restrictions on the order of dimensions, but recommends using the order
(time, depth/height/z, y, x)
But is there a recommendation/requirement for the order of the additional ensemble/realization dimension for output from ensemble ocean or atmospheric models?
E.g.
(ensemble_number, time, depth/height/z, y, x)
or(time, depth/height/z, ensemble_number, y, x)
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: