-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coinbase output address and coinbase tag for block 683919 don't match #36
Comments
Generally, for quality assurance, the coinbase tags and output addresses (if both have a match) could be tested for equality. Would be a good way to find potential errors. |
Running this. It will take a while to go through the whole chain as I didn't optimize the code.
|
That's awesome, thanks! I guess there is no need to check the whole chain, i previously tested the identification starting at height 300000. Seems like there are quite a few Huobi ≠ EMCD mismatches... And TSMPool too?? |
Not sure where it's at now, process is still running but didn't produce anything for a while. It seems it's below block 300k (it runs in reverse) so that matches what you state. The list of address vs. tag mismatches:
I've attached the log, so you can lookup specific blocks: I'm not familiar on how the addresses are gathered, so I don't know how to proceed from here. |
Thanks! I'll have a look soon. I know that e.g UKRPool and OKKONG merged. |
The coinbase output address and coinbase tag for block 683919 don't match.
Based on the coinbase output address
1EepjXgvWUoRyNvuLSAxjiqZ1QqKGDANLW
the pool is identified as Houbi Pool.https://github.com/0xB10C/known-mining-pools/blob/b601e8de52c09e9e0b50436b63f5e1251d4ab9f5/pools.json#L669-L672
Based on the coinbase tag
/one_more_mcd/
the pool is identified as EMCDPool.https://github.com/0xB10C/known-mining-pools/blob/b601e8de52c09e9e0b50436b63f5e1251d4ab9f5/pools.json#L539-L542
The address 1EepjXgvWUoRyNvuLSAxjiqZ1QqKGDANLW received coinbase transactions cointaining
/HuoBi/
. The address was added by @wanghao-huobi in btccom#77CC @mutatrum @hsjoberg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: