[Eyes] License header check fails when the license is not Apache 2.0

[AltarIbnL]

I have referred to others' source files and tried to mark their license, it keeps showing that the file does not have a valid license header.
The license in my own project is Apache 2.0 and it passes the test. But the license of the new file is BSD-3-Clause and it keeps showing that the license is invalid.
Here is my .licenserc.yaml in root path:

It will failed while running
license-eye -c .licenserc.yaml header check

However， if I change the license to Apache-2.0, It will pass the check successfully.

Is there something wrong with my steps, sorry for bordering you.

[wu-sheng]

Ping @kezhenxu94

[kezhenxu94]

Hi. Why do you specify three different licenses for the same path?

[AltarIbnL]

Hi. In my project, we use Apache 2.0 as our license while the external library (Kubernetes, Mockery) we referenced is Apache 2.0 and BSD-3-Clause. We specify three licenses on the same path due to the files are on the same path.
Mockery will generate a template code automatically, which should tag with their license. The problem we met is no matter what license we set in .licenserc.yaml , it will fail with an invalid license even if we change the path to the package it's located.

[kezhenxu94]

it will fail with an invalid license even if we change the path to the package it's located.

Please add the path to paths-ignore in the other two license section.

[AltarIbnL]

Please add the path to paths-ignore in the other two license section.
Thx! The problem fixed after I add the path to paths-ignor.