You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
// IsNameServersStrUpdated is whether the name server list is updated
IsNameServersStrUpdated=false
// IsNameServersStrInitialized is whether the name server list is initialized
IsNameServersStrInitialized=false
// BrokerClusterName is the broker cluster name
BrokerClusterName=""
// svc of controller for brokers
ControllerAccessPoint=""
Given the code above, our operator can only manage one RocketMQ cluster at a time (one nameservice deployment and one broker cluster). In a multi-tenant Kubernetes usage scenario, users may want to deploy multiple RocketMQ clusters in different namespaces.
Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
One potential workaround might be to deploy one operator with one RocketMQ cluster in a single namespace. However, this is not a very efficient strategy in a Kubernetes environment.
If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:
Please describe the feature you are requesting.
I propose the enhancement of the current operator to support the management of multiple RocketMQ clusters by a single operator.
Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
rocketmq-operator/pkg/share/share.go
Lines 23 to 38 in ad72466
Given the code above, our operator can only manage one RocketMQ cluster at a time (one nameservice deployment and one broker cluster). In a multi-tenant Kubernetes usage scenario, users may want to deploy multiple RocketMQ clusters in different namespaces.
Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
One potential workaround might be to deploy one operator with one RocketMQ cluster in a single namespace. However, this is not a very efficient strategy in a Kubernetes environment.
If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: