You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The config file suggests using wave files is faster than shared memory. It seems somewhat counter-intuitive but I tried it anyway, using a RAM disk as D:\ and setting transfermethod=wavefile. CWSL_DIGI still reports the shared memories when starting up and I see no noticeable change in CPU load. Is there something I have missed? I decode thirtysomething FT4 and FT8 segments.
Björn SM7IUN
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Doing more tests I can actually see the CPU load increase slightly when using the wavefile transfer method. Could this perhaps be because I use a RAM disk? Also, intuitively, shared memory should be lighter on CPU.
The config file suggests using wave files is faster than shared memory. It seems somewhat counter-intuitive but I tried it anyway, using a RAM disk as D:\ and setting transfermethod=wavefile. CWSL_DIGI still reports the shared memories when starting up and I see no noticeable change in CPU load. Is there something I have missed? I decode thirtysomething FT4 and FT8 segments.
Björn SM7IUN
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: