-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plasmids classified as viruses #6
Comments
Interesting. They both predicted as viruses by other tools, such as VirSorter, and match phages P1 and P7 with IDY 96-98% and span 86%. |
FWIW Platon (https://github.com/oschwengers/platon) predicts it as plasmid. |
I'm pretty sure that plasmidVerify would also classify it as plasmid. Current logic for viralVerify is to compare V vs P+C and then only if P+C compare P vs C. It is vulnerable to such cases, but I suppose it is not a common situation.. |
So, the right answer for such contigs should be virus_or_plasmid that is not currently supported by viralverify. |
Consider the attached FASTA file. It contains two sequences that match a plasmid from RefSeq at 99% IDY. However, there are classified as virus by viralVerify. Looks strange.
ic5-metaplasmidspades.plasmid.fasta.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: