Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ThreadIt SPAM, PramUkesh #231

Open
slrslr opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

ThreadIt SPAM, PramUkesh #231

slrslr opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@slrslr
Copy link

slrslr commented Jun 18, 2024

Hello,

please kindly check ThreadIt, it is SPAMmed currently using bot.
Block new posts and remove the SPAM (check links in the leading post).

If not done already, you may consider contacting Caryoscelus regarding his identity provider GateWay, as a temporary solution. I think that some developer may setup centralized page that will feature https://hcaptcha.com to provide certificates in more automated fashion.

@mx5kevin
Copy link

mx5kevin commented Jun 27, 2024

ZeroVerse, ZeroID (Bitmsg), Gate Way, the problem here have a "cert_sign" generator which is not provided by the site owner. Send him a private message with the username, and your public key, and he generating it with his private key for you a vaild "cert_sign". Without it you can not puplish comment or content. If sombody clone it this ID service, how does it generate this without a simple to use public generator? Because those who know how it works will not allow people selected by others on their own service. The listed services are all unusable for this reason. And they are a big fat scam. A ZeroVerse clone with a simple public easy to use HTML web interface generator for the admins would be the most simplest. Add this to a .zip file, with the required tools like bitcoin key generator/how to setup. And allow the users to clone it. No one can centrally control these ID service providers, or customize another user which users can use your service. Based on this nickname, users can be added to a list and filtered. But a good solution would be to write a plugin, if example 1 week or 1 month POW are passed the user decentralized way automatic way get a current one time registered username with a account. In a blockchain without messaging private users. For this attack, a incompetent rival developer like Caryoscelus, or a government responsible. Who do you think would energy time to develop, run such an attack bot, when even small improvements do not work on this network?

I read an idea in a decentralized way if someone pays for it, or mining get the account. And I have to agree with the paid solution. The most effective solution is for someone to pay X amount to an account or to mine it decentralized way get automatic way the account, and later the same way higher zite limits.

But the problem is that there is currently no suitable developer who would do this well.

The remove spam method http://127.0.0.1:43110/15UYrA7aXr2Nto1Gg4yWXpY3EAJwafMTNk/?Topic:1670244792_1L4dZcDF2maSKHDy788yhxpYnBWnXadUtS/Site+admins+How+to+block+ID+provider+s+on+zite+block+deny+new+users+from+it+and+whitelist+all+existing+users

in the link a working way. This should be simplified we need only the Site\data\users(current user folder hash). If this is available given any site administrator can allow a current user. In a chat, private msg administrators simple way can get a current user hash, and name. A chat, private msg system with a puzzle can avoid bots. but that's not exit again.

Which could be solved currently the user send a msg in a public chat. We give him a Nanopool compatible XMR miner, the user find with and add his public folder hash to the miner. We take as a basis a quota corresponding to one week of mining. For extra site limits proportionately so. This can be done by donating to a address too. User hashes what are appear in the pool and have one week average (non stop mining) the administrator are adding the user to his service. The administrator does not have to do anything other than search for the addresses among the miners, search in the chat. Add the hashes to the services, and block another users to register with the same nickname. An exception to this should be developers or those who help the network in other ways. It would help with not only one, but several problems at the same time. There will certainly be far fewer of us, but those who remain will be non trolls, idiots and incompetent people.

@mx5kevin
Copy link

mx5kevin commented Jun 27, 2024

If not done already, you may consider contacting Caryoscelus regarding his identity provider GateWay, as a temporary solution.

Try to clone it, and clone it a forum add it, and try to publish send comment to another users, it will failed ind the sending. It would need a public simple generator for the site owners, which it does not added to the service. With generates it in a private messages sent user names public key with his private key the cert sign. If you clone this service, if a user somehow send you his nickname, with his public key, as admin simply how do you generate this? He stole the idea from ZeroVerse. The difference is that there if the nickname was added to a list with the cert sign, the username cannot be re-registered. This service is just a dumbed-down version of it. As he usual, he looks at his users as stupid and lies to them wherever he can. This scam was not started by him, but by the original developer of Zeronet. We need a simple generator for all admins with a ZeroVerse clone needed where the site admins add the user name, user public key and with the admin private key generating a valid cert. If the service administrator disappears, only his service crashes and not many other people's services. The other thing is that no one else filters the users for the site owners. One public key/file can registered in unlimited ID providers.

@mx5kevin
Copy link

A 100% decentralized captcha puzzle would be the solution when a user sending a comment or any content. This eliminates the spam bot problem. This is the most effective working proven method. Against idiots and undesirables users the best one used by torrent trackers reference from other sites. Or if it can't be solved in the world of crypto, it is a proven method that you pay for join.

@styromaniac
Copy link

PramUkesh gave up after I stopped funding his work.

@mx5kevin
Copy link

mx5kevin commented Oct 8, 2024

PramUkesh gave up after I stopped funding his work.

If a big project can stop by withdrawing the support of a single person, then I understand the developer's point of view. Downloads should be allowed in proportion to seeding, or the user should pay for it. The same for users registration. The money generated from this goes to the content creators, developers and those who help share the content. Forums are full of useless comments, the community is completely unable to develop the project or support another ways. There must be a sensible way to bring money into the project so that those who need the content pay. If there is a business in it, there will be developers who can develop it. Spammers, idiots, and those who do not seed the content must be filtered with paid way for the use of social media sites and for downloading files. That's what cryptocurrencies are there for with hosting, mining, or transfer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants