-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UV decomposition #3
Comments
Please take a look at this line ATMC/super_module/super_class.py Line 485 in ecf61a6
For the implementation, the DeepLRModel could substitute the sp one as the super class for models like ResNet34. |
But the code use DeepSP_v2Model rather than DeepLRModel (cidar10, ResNet34), Is there any difference between them? |
Please refer to this line ATMC/super_module/super_class.py Line 793 in ecf61a6
if you are trying to figure out how the decomposition work in ATMC. By the way, the DeepLRModel serves at the Low-rank baseline in the paper. I thought you were trying to reproduce that one in your previous question. No relation exists between those two super modules.
Yes, those two weights are the decomposition matrices for U and V.
Those models refer to the duplicated optimization variables applied in ADMM. |
Hello, I would like to ask which part of the implementation of UV decomposition mentioned in the paper, I did not find the code of this part
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: