Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Built in filament unload causing clogs #138

Closed
smwoodward-beep opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

Built in filament unload causing clogs #138

smwoodward-beep opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@smwoodward-beep
Copy link

What happened

The tip forming dipping done prior to fully ejecting the filament with an Orbiter 2 and Phaetus UHF Rapido pulls up molten filament when ejecting into the bowden tube between extruder and hot end, cools and hardens.

What did you expect to happen

The filament should eject cleanly

How to reproduce

Fairly obvious.

Additional information

No response

@smwoodward-beep smwoodward-beep added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 25, 2024
@HelgeKeck
Copy link

HelgeKeck commented Jun 25, 2024

This is not a bug.

RatOS V2.1 has a inbuilt tip forming protocol before it unlaods a filament. it comes with default values that work for msot people, but its not possible to provide settings for every situation, this depends heavily on used nozzle, filament brand and type and selected temperature.

depending you your configuration you need to override the tip forming parameters for your situation, for example if you use a UHF CHT nozzle then you override _UNLOAD_UHF_CHT in your prionter.cfg

[gcode_macro _UNLOAD_UHF_CHT]
gcode:
	# parameter
	{% set toolhead = params.TOOLHEAD|int %}

	DEBUG_ECHO PREFIX="_UNLOAD_UHF_CHT" MSG="TOOLHEAD: {toolhead}"

	_TIP_FORMING RETRACT_LENGTH=18 COOLING_MOVE_LENGTH=10 DIP=False

@miklschmidt requesting to close this since its not a bug

@smwoodward-beep

This comment was marked as abuse.

@HelgeKeck
Copy link

Should these not be variables instead of the user needing to override a full macro?

no, it is handled depending on the used nozzle size and type, there are several of these small macros you can override, this is easier than to provide variables for all different nozzle types

@HelgeKeck
Copy link

if you need more informations i suggest to ask in the discord server

@smwoodward-beep

This comment was marked as abuse.

@smwoodward-beep

This comment was marked as abuse.

@HelgeKeck
Copy link

i did not insulted you and this is place is purely for bug discussions.

@miklschmidt requesting a close

@smwoodward-beep

This comment was marked as abuse.

@smwoodward-beep

This comment was marked as abuse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants