-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BRATS DATASET has three classes, TC, WT, and ET. Performance always comes zero for third class during validation #138
Comments
Hi @Sharifmhamza , the BRATS data used in UNETR should be the MSD Task01, which is from BRATS16. The SwinUNETR used BRATS21 data for experiments. The original data formats, construction of labels are different. The loss function are configured slightly different. Sigmoid is used in the SwinUNETR, and output channel is 3, no background. The difference might be the reason causing errors. |
Hello Contributor, I am using Swin UNETR on the BraTS21 dataset with an output channel of 3 and using sigmoid (as per the files in the project), but in the validation results, the ET (Enhancing Tumor) is still close to 0. Do you know what might be causing this issue? |
Hello, I encountered this issue during network training as well, where the third class (ET) consistently has a Dice score of 0. Did you manage to resolve it? Do you have any suggestions? |
Hi, we reproduce the results at https://github.com/Luffy03/Large-Scale-Medical. You can find our implementation at https://github.com/Luffy03/Large-Scale-Medical/tree/main/Downstream/monai/BRATS21. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: