You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I;m working through chapter 4. In the prediction of the test set, you use train_mask_str in the book but in your gh code you use train_mask. Depending on which one you use one gets very different results.
if you pass the integer mask you get something that won't go pass 60% accuracy.
But if i pass the string mask i get what you report both in gh and the book . Which seems really high considering how many samples you pick out in the train and test.
Hi, sorry for the very late reply! Thank you for noticing this discrepancy between the book and the code. Unfortunately, I can't replicate your issue. The data type should not matter here because it's masking the same nodes.
No problem. thanks you for the reply (and amazing book). I think this is more of an issue with node2vec. I'll take what I learned conceptually and move on 😊 thanks!
Hello,
I;m working through chapter 4. In the prediction of the test set, you use train_mask_str in the book but in your gh code you use
train_mask
. Depending on which one you use one gets very different results.if you pass the integer mask you get something that won't go pass 60% accuracy.
But if i pass the string mask i get what you report both in gh and the book . Which seems really high considering how many samples you pick out in the train and test.
How can one explain this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: