You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a Developer, I'd like it if the license under which a blueprint is being provided was clearly indicated both within the Blueprint as well as in its description in the content browser so I can identify what licensing restrictions I am subject to when I open the blueprint without having to ask the project maintainer.
Acceptance Criteria
Given I am working with a Blueprint that is licensed under the OGL or MPL:
Given I open the blueprint for editing in Unreal Engine and am looking at the "Event Graph":
I'd expect to see a colorful (pink - R:1.0, G:0.0, B:0.25) comment in size 14 text in the upper left corner of the event graph that indicates whether the blueprint is licensed under the MPL or OGL licenses.
For example:
Given that the event graph is very tall: I am willing to scroll up to the top left of the event graph to find the license comment.
Given I hover over the Blueprint in the content browser: I'd expect the tooltip description that ends with the license; for example:
---
OpenPF2 for UE Game Logic, Copyright YEAR, Guy Elsmore-Paddock. All Rights Reserved.
Content from Pathfinder 2nd Edition is licensed under the Open Game License (OGL) v1.0a, subject to the following:
- Open Game License v 1.0a, Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
- System Reference Document, Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
- Pathfinder Core Rulebook (Second Edition), Copyright 2019, Paizo Inc.
Except for material designated as Product Identity, the game mechanics and logic in this file are Open Game Content, as defined in the Open Game License version 1.0a, Section 1(d) (see accompanying LICENSE.TXT). No portion of this file other than the material designated as Open Game Content may be reproduced in any form without written permission.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GuyPaddock
changed the title
[Developers] Embed Licensing in Comments within Blueprint Event Graphs
[Developers] Embed License Type as a Comment within Each Blueprint Event Graphs
Sep 12, 2023
GuyPaddock
changed the title
[Developers] Embed License Type as a Comment within Each Blueprint Event Graphs
[Developers] Embed License Type as a Comment within Each Blueprint Event Graph
Sep 12, 2023
GuyPaddock
changed the title
[Developers] Embed License Type as a Comment within Each Blueprint Event Graph
[Developers] Embed Licensing within Each Blueprint
Dec 27, 2023
For this ticket, I also need to move the OGL citations for some GEs out of "UIData Text Only" blocks and into either comments in the blueprint graph or the description of the GE. For example, see /OpenPF2Core/OpenPF2/Core/Conditions/GE_CheckCondition_KnockedOut.GE_CheckCondition_KnockedOut
As a Developer, I'd like it if the license under which a blueprint is being provided was clearly indicated both within the Blueprint as well as in its description in the content browser so I can identify what licensing restrictions I am subject to when I open the blueprint without having to ask the project maintainer.
Acceptance Criteria
Given I am working with a Blueprint that is licensed under the OGL or MPL:
I'd expect to see a colorful (pink -
R:1.0
,G:0.0
,B:0.25
) comment in size 14 text in the upper left corner of the event graph that indicates whether the blueprint is licensed under the MPL or OGL licenses.For example:
Given that the event graph is very tall: I am willing to scroll up to the top left of the event graph to find the license comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: