Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping of ND-Participants and BT-47-Lot #11

Open
csnyulas opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Mapping of ND-Participants and BT-47-Lot #11

csnyulas opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested for implementation

Comments

@csnyulas
Copy link
Contributor

csnyulas commented May 19, 2024

We proposed the following mappings:

  • for ND-Participants
    • Class Path: epo:PurchaseContract / epo:MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome / epo:SelectedCandidateList
    • Property Path: ?this epo:resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome / epo:resultsFromUsingCandidateList ?value.
  • and for BT-47-Lot:
    • Class Path: epo:PurchaseContract / epo:MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome / epo:SelectedCandidateList / epo:Canditate
    • Property Path: ?this epo:resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome / epo:resultsFromUsingCandidateList / epo:containsCandidate ?value.

OP Feedback says: "The participant concerns Design Contests so it is not about a minicompetition"

Unfortunately, as far as we can tell, ePO 4.0.0 does not provide a relationship between epo:SelectedCandidateList (or epo:Canditate) and epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm, but it is only linked to epo:MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome
image

What should we do?

  • Should we not map this field (and node)?
  • Should we map it conditionally to epo:MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome (i.e. only if the field is part of a CAN, but not if it is part of a CN)?
  • should we perhaps link the epo:Candidate instances to some of the epo:ProcurementObject instances through the epo:contextualisedBy property? If yes, to which one(s) and through what Class/Property Path(s)? What about the epo:SelectedCandidateList?

This problem should be probably addressed in the future versions of EPO, so an issue in the ePO GitHub repository should be created.

@csnyulas csnyulas added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested for implementation labels May 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested for implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants