Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Map the new BTs described on Regulation 2023/2884 to ePO concepts. #691

Open
AchillesDougalis opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Map the new BTs described on Regulation 2023/2884 to ePO concepts. #691

AchillesDougalis opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@AchillesDougalis
Labels
act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Milestone
5.0.0

Comments

@AchillesDougalis
Copy link
Contributor

AchillesDougalis commented Oct 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

There needs to be an alignment with the new Annex document on implementing the Regulation 2023/2884 .

Specifically, to make sure that the new BTs (those marked with yellow in the "Annex-TC" tab in the Annex) can be mapped to ePO concepts.

{D6EF94C7-F7B3-408B-8813-62D61DE47305}

Any BTs currently unmappable to the latest ePO version should be discussed at a WGM.
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO labels Oct 2, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Oct 2, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis

Labels
act: for implementation it can be implemented and closed, all is clear aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@AchillesDougalis