You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a specific reason why in multiple notice types (e.g. 16, 17) the fields BT-761 (Tenderer Legal Form) and BT-76 (Tenderer Legal Form Description) are nested under GR-Lot-TendererQualification, which also holds BT-771 (Late Tenderer Information) and BT-772 (Late Tenderer Information Description)?
In fields.json, they belong to different nodes (ND-TendererLegalForm and ND-LateTendererInformation respectively, both children of ND-LotTenderingTerms)
And since GR-Lot-TendererQualification is translated / labeled as "Information about late submission", BT-761 and BT-76 seem a bit out of place:
Or it is just a matter of finding a better label for GR-Lot-TendererQualification?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @mdewinne, originally the label was different, but the fact remains right now it's not correct. We can either create separate groups for the legal form and late submission, or find a different label. We will address it in the next SDK version
Is there a specific reason why in multiple notice types (e.g. 16, 17) the fields BT-761 (Tenderer Legal Form) and BT-76 (Tenderer Legal Form Description) are nested under GR-Lot-TendererQualification, which also holds BT-771 (Late Tenderer Information) and BT-772 (Late Tenderer Information Description)?
In fields.json, they belong to different nodes (ND-TendererLegalForm and ND-LateTendererInformation respectively, both children of ND-LotTenderingTerms)
And since GR-Lot-TendererQualification is translated / labeled as "Information about late submission", BT-761 and BT-76 seem a bit out of place:
Or it is just a matter of finding a better label for GR-Lot-TendererQualification?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: