We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a common runtime expression validation format or regex out in the wild? I tried the googles, but nothing comes up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jeremyfiel you could use abnf-to-regexp to generate one.
Sorry, something went wrong.
ChatGPT proposes this:
^\$(?:url|method|statusCode|(?:request|response|message)\.(?:header\.[!#$%&'*+\-.^_`|~0-1]+|query\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|path\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|body(?:#(?:[^\/~]|~[01])*) )|inputs\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|outputs\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|steps\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|workflows\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|sourceDescriptions\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|components\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+|components\.parameters\.[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+)$
Not confident in that. Also, not confident what CHAR should mean (here it is limited to alphanumeric and _.- characters.
_.-
See #253
No branches or pull requests
Is there a common runtime expression validation format or regex out in the wild? I tried the googles, but nothing comes up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: