Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attribute value pairs message is not considered while simulation #469

Open
tinaafitz opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Attribute value pairs message is not considered while simulation #469

tinaafitz opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@tinaafitz
Copy link
Member

tinaafitz commented Jan 11, 2021

Original BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753523

Description of problem:
If you put 'message' in 'attribute/value pairs' field then it does not consider while simulation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.11.0.25.20190913144023_5682444

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Create domain, namespace, class and instance pointing to method
  2. Navigate to automate > automation > simulation page
  3. Fill values as shown in screenshot.
  4. See automation.logs

Actual results:
[----] I, [2019-09-19T03:29:39.214008 #10804:41c3a00] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/test_name/test_class/test_instance#create]
[----] I, [2019-09-19T03:29:39.214742 #10804:41c3a00] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/System/Request/Call_Instance#create]

It does not consider attribute 'message' in logs with test_instance.

Expected results:
[----] I, [2019-09-19T03:29:39.214008 #10804:41c3a00] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/test_name/test_class/test_instance#hello]
[----] I, [2019-09-19T03:29:39.214742 #10804:41c3a00] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/System/Request/Call_Instance#create]

It should consider attribute message in logs with test_instance as per BZ fixed for custom button simulation: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651099

Additional info:

  • This behaviour is same for simulation on 5.10 and 5.11. Hence not adding it as a regression.

image

@gtanzillo gtanzillo added the bug label Jan 14, 2021
@gtanzillo
Copy link
Member

@tinaafitz Should this be assigned now or can it be help wanted?

@tinaafitz
Copy link
Member Author

@gtanzillo It can be help wanted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants