You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
while testing Cyrius v1.1.1 on CYP2D6-calling on samples from GeT-RM I encountered something unexpected. On a publication that used Cyrius v1.1, sample NA18565 is correctly genotyped as *10/*36x2 (supplementary materials). Nevertheless, v1.1.1 that I used calls this sample as *36/*36+*10.
The BAM file for this sample was downloaded from the ENA website and used as is.
*36/*36+*10 is indeed what Cyrius would call this sample. All three star alleles are matching with *10/*36x2. The difference is in how the haplotypes are assigned into two alleles. Based on short read data, it is not clear whether the two copies of *36 are on the same allele, and Cyrius outputs what it thinks is more likely. I'm not sure whether the exact phasing of *10/*36x2 has been confirmed by any technology.
Hello there,
while testing Cyrius v1.1.1 on CYP2D6-calling on samples from GeT-RM I encountered something unexpected. On a publication that used Cyrius v1.1, sample NA18565 is correctly genotyped as *10/*36x2 (supplementary materials). Nevertheless, v1.1.1 that I used calls this sample as *36/*36+*10.
The BAM file for this sample was downloaded from the ENA website and used as is.
Cyrius was called as:
Could this be due to an error on my end?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: