Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] - Date Formats #728

Open
kaibagley opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

[FEATURE REQUEST] - Date Formats #728

kaibagley opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kaibagley
Copy link

Hey,

I might be missing an option but in case I'm not, I'd love to be able to change the date format from: mm/dd/yyyy to dd/mm/yyyy as an Australian.

Thanks so much!

@IgnisDa
Copy link
Owner

IgnisDa commented Apr 1, 2024

I'm an Indian so dd/mm/yyyy is the default here too. But as a programmer it's just easier to use the American standard.

I'll have to estimate the effort that I'll need to make this change. I'll see what I can do.

@j450n1
Copy link

j450n1 commented Apr 1, 2024

I'd also find this useful as I'm from the UK 😊

@lucantonissen
Copy link

Only using yyyy/mm/dd is also an option to avoid confusion

@IgnisDa
Copy link
Owner

IgnisDa commented Apr 22, 2024

@lucantonissen You mentioned only using yyyy/mm/dd. Is some other format used in Ryot? If so, could you point it out where?

@IgnisDa IgnisDa changed the title [Feature Request] - Date Formats [FEATURE REQUEST] - Date Formats May 11, 2024
@IgnisDa IgnisDa added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
@emhl
Copy link

emhl commented Sep 26, 2024

the most common formats would probably be:

  • MM/DD/YYYY (current)
  • DD/MM/YYYY
  • DD.MM.YYYY (DMY often uses a diferent seperator than /)
  • YYYY-MM-DD (ISO 8601)
    and In my opinion ISO 8601 would be a more sensible default setting

@rclingman
Copy link

Always happy to see ISO 8601.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants