You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
fatcat's -z mode is great for backups of FAT filesystems, in order to make them more compressible.
Would there be any interest in adding fallocate support for making holes in the file for similar space-saving purposes? I've hacked around a proof of concept which seems to work.
This would be functionally similar to defragging / compacting then shrinking the filesystem, except when done right, no undeleted data is touched.
(Why do this? I have backups of filesystems with low %age use, but prefer to keep them in the exact backup file which dd copies. It would save gigs of space to be able to make the files sparse.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fatcat's
-z
mode is great for backups of FAT filesystems, in order to make them more compressible.Would there be any interest in adding fallocate support for making holes in the file for similar space-saving purposes? I've hacked around a proof of concept which seems to work.
This would be functionally similar to defragging / compacting then shrinking the filesystem, except when done right, no undeleted data is touched.
(Why do this? I have backups of filesystems with low %age use, but prefer to keep them in the exact backup file which
dd
copies. It would save gigs of space to be able to make the files sparse.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: